Triware Networld Systems 

21 Years Of Around The Clock Superior Network Systems Service & Support!

 

Home
Solution
Technology
Service
Support
Client
Partner
Career
Events
News
   Back ] Up ] Next ]
 
   

 

DIGITAL INFORMATION SECURITY

Our society has spent hundreds of billions of dollars in the last few decades to convert data and images into digital form. And we have continued to pour money into this in the last 10 years as the popularity of the Internet and other computer technologies increase. By now, everything and anything with the least bit of important is available in digital form — or will be if it isn’t already.

Gone are the days of cancelled checks since most banks now scan and store them as digital images. Gone, too, are most paper bank statements, which have increasingly become converted into electronic statements that are just as good as paper ones.

On June 30, 2000, former President Bill Clinton signed the e-signature bill into law.  The bill recognizes online “electronic” signatures as legitimate to complete legal agreements and commercial transactions. Many similar developments have occurred since the signing of this bill.

Today’s digital information has become the backbone of hundreds of billions of dollars worldwide spent annually on the digital economy. In fact, the command and control centers for the United States armed forces would fall apart if mission-critical digital information wasn’t available or compromised.  Corporations and organizations worldwide, large and small would cease to function if we took away their digital information.

But how secure is our digital information? Is our digital information protected from natural disasters, computer hackers and human errors?

The answer is a resounding “no.”  Almost everyone knows someone who lost data on a Personal Computer (PC) because of a virus, hacker, hardware issues, Internet-related faults or identity theft.

So what about those organizations whom we trust to store our most intimate information digitally? You would think they at least would have the resources to protect our information. Well, think again!

Below are just a few hacks that occurred between February 15 and September 19 of this year, according to Privacy Rights Clearinghouse in San Diego, California.

Date

 

Organization

Type of

Breach

Number of Records

15-Feb-05

ChoicePoint

ID thieves accessed

145,000

25-Feb-05

Bank of America

Lost backup tape

1,200,000

25-Feb-05

PayMaxx

Exposed online

25,000

8-Mar-05

DSW/Retail Ventures

Hacking

100,000

10-Mar-05

LexisNexis

Passwords compromised

32,000

11-Mar-05

Univ. of CA, Berkeley

Stolen laptop

98,400

11-Mar-05

Boston College

Hacking

120,000

12-Mar-05

NV Dept. of Motor Vehicle

Stolen computer

8,900

20-Mar-05

Northwestern Univ.

Hacking

21,000

20-Mar-05

Univ. of NV., Las Vegas

Hacking

5,000

22-Mar-05

Calif. State Univ., Chico

Hacking

59,000

23-Mar-05

Univ. of CA, San Francisco

Hacking

7,000

28-Mar-05

Univ. of Chicago Hospital

Dishonest insider

unknown

?-Apr-05

Georgia DMV

Dishonest insider

100s of 1000s

5-Apr-05

MCI

Stolen laptop

16,500

8-Apr-05

Eastern National

Hacker

15,000

8-Apr-05

San Jose Med. Group

Stolen computer

185,000

11-Apr-05

Tufts University

Hacking

106,000

12-Apr-05

LexisNexis

Passwords compromised

280,000

14-Apr-05

Polo Ralph Lauren/HSBC

Hacking

180,000

14-Apr-05

Calif. Fastrack

Dishonest Insider

4,500

15-Apr-05

CA Dept. of Health Services

Stolen laptop

21,600

18-Apr-05

DSW/ Retail Ventures

Hacking

1,300,000

20-Apr-05

Ameritrade

Lost backup tape

200,000

21-Apr-05

Carnegie Mellon Univ.

Hacking

19,000

26-Apr-05

Mich. State Univ's Wharton Center

Hacking

40,000

26-Apr-05

Christus St. Joseph's Hospital

Stolen computer

19,000

28-Apr-05

Georgia Southern Univ.

Hacking

10s of 1000s

28-Apr-05

Wachovia, Bank of America,

Dishonest insiders

676,000

PNC Financial Services Group and Commerce Bancorp

29-Apr-05

Oklahoma State Univ.

Missing laptop

37,000

2-May-05

Time Warner

Lost backup tapes

600,000

4-May-05

CO. Health Dept.

Stolen laptop

1,600 (families)

5-May-05

Purdue Univ.

Hacking

11,360

7-May-05

Dept. of Justice

Stolen laptop

80,000

11-May-05

Stanford Univ.

Hacking

9,900

12-May-05

Hinsdale Central High School

Hacking

2,400

16-May-05

Westborough Bank

Dishonest insider

750

18-May-05

Jackson Comm. College, Michigan

Hacking

8,000

18-May-05

Univ. of Iowa

Hacking

30,000

19-May-05

Valdosta State Univ., GA

Hacking

40,000

20-May-05

Purdue Univ.

Hacking

11,000

26-May-05

Duke Univ.

Hacking

5,500

27-May-05

Cleveland State Univ.

Stolen laptop

44,420

28-May-05

Merlin Data Services

Bogus acct. set up

9,000

30-May-05

Motorola

Computers stolen

unknown

6-Jun-05

CitiFinancial

Lost backup tapes

3,900,000

10-Jun-05

Fed. Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC)

Not disclosed

6,000

16-Jun-05

CardSystems

Hacking

40,000,000

17-Jun-05

Kent State Univ.

Stolen laptop

1,400

18-Jun-05

Univ. of Hawaii

Dishonest Insider

150,000

22-Jun-05

Eastman Kodak

Stolen laptop

5,800

22-Jun-05

East Carolina Univ.

Hacking

250

25-Jun-05

Univ. of CT (UCONN)

Hacking

72,000

28-Jun-05

Lucas Cty. Children Services (OH)

Exposed by email

900

29-Jun-05

Bank of America

Stolen laptop

18,000

30-Jun-05

Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr.

Stolen laptop

15,000

1-Jul-05

Univ. of CA, San Diego

Hacking

3,300

6-Jul-05

City National Bank

Lost backup tapes

unknown

7-Jul-05

Mich. State Univ.

Hacking

27,000

19-Jul-05

Univ. of Southern Calif. (USC)

Hacking

270,000 possibly accessed; “dozens" exposed

21-Jul-05

Univ. of Colorado-Boulder

Hacking

42,000

30-Jul-05

San Diego Co. Employees Retirement Assoc.

Hacking

33,000

30-Jul-05

Calif. State Univ., Dominguez Hills

Hacking

9,613

31-Jul-05

Cal Poly-Pomona

Hacking

31,077

2-Aug-05

Univ. of Colorado

Hacking

36,000

9-Aug-05

Sonoma State Univ.

Hacking

61,709

10-Aug-05

Univ. of North Texas

Hacking

39,000

17-Aug-05

Calif. State University, Stanislaus

Hacking

900

19-Aug-05

Univ. of Colorado

Hacking

49,000

22-Aug-05

Air Force

Hacking

33,300

27-Aug-05

Univ. of Florida, Health Sciences Center/ChartOne

Stolen Laptop

3,851

30-Aug-05

J.P. Morgan, Dallas

Stolen Laptop

Unknown

30-Aug-05

Calif. State University, Chancellor's Office

Hacking

154

10-Sep-05

Kent State Univ.

Stolen Computers

100,000

15-Sep-05

Miami Univ.

Exposed Online

21,762

16-Sep-05

ChoicePoint 

ID thieves accessed; misuse of IDs & passwords.

9,903

(2nd notice, see 2/15/05 for 145,000)

19-Sep-05

Children's Health Council, San Jose CA

Stolen backup tape

5,000 - 6,000

TOTAL

 

 

50,721,749

Just to complicate matters even more, many organizations are now required by laws to keep all of their digital information, including all electronic e-mails, for five or more years.  The obvious burden is the immediate Information Technology (IT) operations required to keep all of this digital information secured and backed up while keeping the vulnerabilities down in an increasingly dangerous environment.

Meanwhile, numerous laws worldwide have been enacted during the last several years aimed at holding corporations and organizations more responsible for protecting the integrity of digital information. But as we’ve seen from the above, these laws have had little effect.

Below are the key laws in the United States regarding the protection of digital information:

 

Region

 

 

Law

 

Digital Information Implications

 

Who's Impacted

US

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)

SOX mandates that organizations ensure the accuracy of financial information and the reliability of systems that generate it. Section 404 of SOX requires management to perform an assessment of internal controls over financial reporting and obtain attestation from external auditors on an annual basis. IT systems are inextricably linked with financial reporting, and information security is essential in ensuring the reliability of these systems.

All companies publicly traded in the United States and regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including US-based companies as well as all international companies that have shares traded on a US exchange.

US

Gramm-Leach-Bliley (GLB)

GLB includes provisions to establishing administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to protect the security, confidentiality, and integrity of consumer financial information.

GLB applies to financial institutions in the US, such as banks, securities firms, insurance companies, and other companies selling financial products.

US

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

There are two rules in particular that affect information security:

HIPAA applies to all healthcare providers, payers, and clearinghouses in the US.

· The HIPAA Privacy Rule covers privacy rights, including uses and disclosures of Protected Health Information (PHI);

· The HIPAA Privacy Rule requires covered entities to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of all electronic PHI and requires them to protect information against any reasonably anticipated threats, hazards, uses, or disclosures;

US

California Assembly Bill 1950 (AB 1950)

California’s Assembly Bill 1950 expands on the privacy requirements of Senate Bill 1386 and requires that organizations take "reasonable precautions" to protect California residents’ personal data from modification, deletion, disclosure and misuse rather than just report on its disclosure.

State Agencies, persons, or businesses conducting business in California that own or license computerized data containing personal information.

US

Title 21 of the Federal Regulations Part 11 (21 CFR Part 11)

21 CFR Part 11 outlines the US Food and Drug Administration’s requirements for electronic records and electronic signatures. It is designed to prevent fraud while permitting the widest possible use of electronic technology within the pharmaceutical industry.

All organizations regulated by the FDA, which includes pharmaceutical, biotech, medical device, food, and cosmetic companies.

Organizations must implement controls to ensure authenticity, integrity, confidentiality, and non-repudiation of electronic records. In some cases, organizations must also implement measures such as encryption and digital signatures.

US

California Information Practice Act or Senate Bill 1386

This regulation requires organizations conducting business in California to disclose any security breach that occurs to any California resident whose unencrypted personal information was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person. Since the law requires notification of security breaches involving “unencrypted” sensitive data, there is a safe harbor for those organizations which have encrypted the data.

State Agencies, persons, or businesses conducting business in California, that own or license computerized data containing personal information.

US

Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA)

FISMA requires federal agencies to develop, document and implement agency-wide programs to secure data and information systems supporting agency operations and assets, including those managed by other agencies or contractors.

Federal agencies, state, local, and tribal governments, as well as private sector organizations composing the critical infrastructure of the United States.

So what is the answer?  How can we protect the very digital information that we depend on so much.  There is not an easy answer.  However, we can look at the key elements that are required to protect our digital information.

Digital information loses its integrity when it is stolen, altered by mistake or altered intentionally for malicious purposes, lost by accident or due to natural disasters

Stolen

Digital Information is most often stolen by insiders, governmental or commercial spies, despite the fact that hackers claim most of the glory and publicity when caught or not.  Stealing is also the hardest to prevent because the infiltrators are usually well-disguised, trusted and/or well-funded with an array of resources.  The thefts originate from all corners of the web and are typically well-planned and executed.

Altered by mistake or intentionally for malicious purposes

There are many reasons digital information may be altered.  Users can themselves make mistakes and alter or erase information by accident.  Hackers, insiders, governmental and commercial spies, and malicious codes can also do the same for malicious purposes.

Please also read our related white papers: “The Convergence of Virus & Spam Threats” and “Public Enemy Number One of the Internet.”

Lost by accident or due to natural disaster

Hardware failures, misplacements and all possible natural disasters, including earthquake, fires, floods and hurricanes, can also contribute the loss of digital information.  In contrast to what most may believe, this type of loss is by far the most preventable.

Digital Information Protection

There are many resources on the Internet that detail how digital information protection should be done, and we have written numerous white papers covering the topic, such as our Air-Tight, Multi-Layer IT Security Defense Systems™ white paper, so I’m not going to cover the details.  However, until someone understands the high-level issues, details are often ignored and misunderstood. Even worse, the protection is completed in a half-hearted fashion and it is not equipped for all possible losses.

Digital Information Protection Matrix

 

 

Security

 

 

Backup

 

Remark

 

Digital

 

ü

 

û

Firewall, Authentication, Encryption & Ongoing Audit

 

Physical

 

ü

 

û

Human Resources Screening, Physical Access Protection & Ongoing Audit

 

Local (Hot)

 

 

û

 

ü

Local Hot Backup Resource For Immediate Recovery

 

Local (Worm)

 

 

û

 

ü

Local Worm Backup Resource For Quick Recovery

 

Local (Cold)

 

 

û

 

ü

Local Cold Backup Resource For Recovery

 

Remote (Hot)

 

 

û

 

ü

Remote Hot Backup Resource For Immediate Recovery

 

Remote (Worm)

 

 

û

 

ü

Remote Worm Backup Resource For Quick Recovery

 

Remote (Hot)

 

 

û

 

ü

Remote Cold Backup Resource For Recovery

Hard Copy (Local & Remote)

 

û

 

 

ü

Local & Remote Hard Copy Resource For Recovery

In the Information Technology business, we must always be prepared for the worst. And our Information Technology architecture, design and procedures should reflect the same, relative to our day-to-day needs, regulatory compliance and resources.  There is no perfect security, nor is there perfect digital information protection. But we should give ourselves the best chance we have of surviving small and large-scale disasters, manmade or natural.

The question is no longer if it will happen but when it will happen.  And the answer is: when we’re least prepared. Just ask the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA has predicted three types of disasters that would hit the United States: (1) A terrorist attack in a major US city, (2) A Category 4 or 5 hurricane hitting New Orleans, and (3) A major earthquake hitting California.  FEMA even ran simulations on some of the scenarios, including the hurricane in New Orleans.  So far, two of the scenarios have proven true, and we have all seen the same results. We’ve all heard the reports of lives lost and properties destroyed.  But what is less visible and underreported is all of the digital information lost during Hurricane Katrina.

Now, consider a major terrorist attack on the Internet or another technical breakdown in the Internet infrastructure. This may be more likely to occur at some point than other disasters.

So, are we ready?

By Benson Yeung, Senior Partner

Benson Yeung Biography

Mr. Yeung has over two decades of IT architecture and security related experience, including extensive experience as an integrator and distributor of IT products and services. In 1991, Mr. Yeung founded Triware Networld Systems, a San Francisco Bay Area IT systems integrator, and in 2000, he founded Triware Networld Solutions, Inc., a San Francisco Bay Area solution provider for IT knowledge management.

Since 1991, Mr. Yeung has consulted on IT and business related issues to over 300 small, medium, and large organizations. He also contributes articles to the Loral Computer Special Interest Group, Microsoft Project, and Silicon Valley Computer Society monthly newsletter.

For more than two decades, Mr. Yeung has spent a significant amount of time in IT security fields including being a forensics investigator, auditor and has a deep understanding of the state of IT security issues and has developed frameworks and best practice methodologies for the field.

Mr. Yeung also works closely with various VC firms and startups in Silicon Valley as a Visionary, Strategist, Technology Advisor and Operations Consultant. Mr. Yeung has a B.S. in Computer Science from Arkansas State University. He is Microsoft Certified System Engineer & Certified Trainer.

Back to Top

Sign up for TNS News Letter

Information Request Form

Select the items that apply, and then let us know how to contact you.

Request a Senior Partner contact me
Request a Web Meeting and / or Web Demo
Subject
Name
Title
Company
Address
E-mail
Phone
Refresh >>
Enter code

Business Partners

     

© Copyrights Triware Networld Systems, L.L.C. ® 1991-2012