|
Digital Information Age
Deception – Social Engineering
Social engineering has been around for as long as there have been
human societies and individuals willing to try to manipulate others. Social
engineering is the art and the science of getting what you need or what you want
by using deception and other techniques based on the fundamentals of human
psychology.
Many examples of social engineering were seen during World War II and the Cold
War.
One classic example from World War II was the Normandy Invasion
(D-Day), on June 6, 1944. The invasion involved a long-range deception plan on a
scale the world had never before seen. The deception misled the Germans as to
the time and place of the invasion and was one of the pivotal aspects that
allowed the allied invasion to succeed, surprising the Germans and giving the
allies a significant advantage.
In computer security, social engineering describes a non-technical
kind of intrusion that relies heavily on human interaction and often involves
tricking other people to break normal security procedures. Such social
engineering activities are going on everyday, all around us, and they are
occurring in a war nearly all of us are fighting: the Digital Information war.
In this war, thieves try to steal our identities and other personal information
in order to commit fraud and other types of financial crimes. However, even
though we are all aware of crimes such as identity theft, these incidents often
do not receive much media attention as many are perpetrated against individuals
and businesses and occur too often to report.
The single largest case involving social engineering in recent
years was the case of Kevin Mitnick, one of the most well-known computer hackers
ever to be caught and jailed. He was arrested by the FBI on February 15, 1995,
and was eventually convicted of wire fraud and of breaking into the computer
systems of Fujitsu, Motorola, Nokia, and Sun Microsystems. He served five years
in prison and was released on January 21, 2000. During his supervised release,
which ended in 2003, he was restricted from using any communications technology
other than a landline telephone.
Although often portrayed as a technical expert, most of Mitnick's
attacks were based on social engineering techniques rather than sophisticated
technical methods or expertise. Indeed, although hackers are commonly thought of
as people who use their knowledge of computers and computer programming
to remotely break into computer or
network systems, they can also be people who simply use various electronic
means, such as email, to gain information for malicious or criminal purposes.
So what are some of the common methods of social engineering?
Dumpster Diving
Dumpster diving or trashing—literally
going through an individual’s or a company’s trash—is one of the earliest
methods of social engineering. One would be surprised by how much information
can be gained from the contents of a company’s trash.
Typical information that hackers are
looking for includes, but is by no means limited to, company directories,
organizational charts, employee handbooks, calendars, policy manuals, memos,
printouts, source codes, disks and tapes, outdated hardware, etc.
It is not hard to imagine if some or
all of the above items were obtained, how hackers could use them to piece
together the intelligence needed to gain access to company files or systems, or
to expand their social engineering efforts by using the information obtained to
further their social engineering activities and gain additional information.
On-Line Scouting
The Internet has become an extremely
fertile ground for all kinds of computer hacking, including social engineering.
Instead of dumpster diving which involves physically going through the target’s
trash, the hackers can now get the same or similar intelligence by scouting for
information virtually, via the Internet.
Much information scouting comes in
the form of “phishing” (also read our white paper on
The Convergence of Virus & Spam Threats).
Phishing is email fraud where the
perpetrator sends out legitimate-looking emails that appear to come from
well-known and trustworthy Web sites in an attempt to gather personal and
financial information from the recipient.
Many of us have heard of or even received mass-targeted phishing
messages, but may not be as aware of or vigilant against phishing requests that
are highly customized and targeted at specific individuals and their
information.
Phone
Calling & Phishing
Sophisticated hackers and scammers
usually do not just rely upon common social engineering strategies to gain
access to the information they want. By the time they place their phone call,
they already have armed themselves with enough intelligence and information
about the target to sound quite legitimate and convincing.
Typical techniques used by these
phone call hackers are to imitate or impersonate someone of authority, and also
to try to intimidate their mark to get the information they need. To achieve
both, hackers need some inside information, and by the time they make the call,
they usually do have enough basic information to try to convince the mark that
the call is legitimate. Consider the following phone conversation:
“Hi, my name is Mary Doe and I work
for John Smith—you know, our CFO. John is on vacation, and I need to get into
his account to find some information so that I can prepare a contract for him to
sign when he is back next week. This is extremely urgent—we are talking about
millions of dollars, and your and my jobs could be on the line. John gave me his
password; it’s ‘1234wxyz’ but it doesn’t work for me for some reason even though
I used it before. Can you verify that this is the password, or can you help me
reset it?”
The same could come in form of email
phishing.
“Hi, this is John Smith, the CFO. I
am on vacation, and I need to get into my account to get some information so I
can prepare a contract to sign when I am back next week. This is extremely
urgent—we are talking about millions of dollars, and your and my jobs could be
on the line. My password is ‘1234wxyz’ but it does not work for me for some
reason even though I used it before. Can you verify that this the password, or
can you help me to reset it? Please email me back the new password if you need
to reset it.”
Persuasion
To be
successful in social engineering, hackers need to be very persuasive. Besides
attempting to impersonate someone and also intimidate the mark, other techniques
involve ingratiating themselves with their target, conforming to expectations,
diffusing responsibility, shoulder surfing, and merely being friendly. These are
just some of the skills hackers use to try to be persuasive. Experienced hackers
usually do not ask for too much information from one source; they prefer to
gather the information from multiple sources so that their identity is better
protected.
Reverse Social Engineering
Reverse social engineering is
probably the most sophisticated and complex method to both set up and execute.
It takes considerable planning and researching to succeed. Reverse social
engineering requires the hackers or their agents to be put in a position from
which intelligence can be gathered first-hand. Often the hackers will create the
condition necessary so that they are in the position to take advantage of the
situation that they themselves helped to create.
Regardless of the methods used, the goal is always to gain
unauthorized access to systems or information, so that such access can be used
to commit fraud, espionage, identity theft, or network intrusion.
Social engineering attacks the weakest point of any IT security
defense system: the people within the organization.
So how can we prevent ourselves from becoming
victims of social engineering?
Below is our Air-Tight, Multi-Layer IT Security Defense Systems™ Solution Matrix
described in our earlier white paper entitled
Air-Tight, Multi-Layer IT Security Defense Systems.
Air-Tight, Multi-Layer IT Security Defense
Systems™ Solution Matrix
|
|
Roles |
|
Layers |
Inter-Organizations /
Governments |
Organization |
People |
Technology |
|
Internet |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Extranet |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Perimeter |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Intranet |
û |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Platform / Device |
û |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Application & Data |
û |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Process |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
We address the people-related issues such as social engineering by
having a sound process. Any air-tight process will require well thought-out
procedures and/or policies and have an ongoing training program to reinforce
them.
It is unrealistic to expect all organizations, especially smaller
organizations, to develop comprehensive security policies (also refer to our
white paper
Rule of Law for Digital Information World – Security Policy) or IT
procedures and keep them up to date. However, below are some recommendations
from the United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team:
 |
Be suspicious of
unsolicited phone calls, visits, or email messages from individuals asking
about employees or other internal information. If an unknown individual
claims to be from a legitimate organization, try to verify his or her
identity directly with the company. |
 |
Do not provide
personal information or information about your organization, including its
structure or networks, unless you are certain of a person's authority to
have the information. |
 |
Do not reveal
personal or financial information in email, and do not respond to email
solicitations for this information. This includes following links sent in
email. |
 |
Don't send
sensitive information over the Internet before checking a web site's
security (see protecting your privacy for more information). |
 |
Pay attention to
the URL of a web site. Malicious web sites may look identical to a
legitimate site, but the URL may use a variation in spelling or a different
domain (e.g., .com vs. .net). |
 |
If you are unsure
whether an email request is legitimate, try to verify it by contacting the
company directly. Do not use contact information provided on a web site
connected to the request; instead, check previous statements for contact
information. Information about known phishing attacks is also available
online from groups such as the Anti-Phishing Working Group (http://www.antiphishing.org/phishing_archive.html).
|
 |
Install and
maintain anti-virus software, firewalls, and email filters to reduce some of
this traffic. |
According to estimates by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC),
social engineering-related issues cost individuals and businesses approximately
$52.6 billion in 2004, and much of that cost is borne by businesses. Since many
incidents of individuals or organizations being victimized by methods of social
engineering are not well publicized, it may not be an issue that many people
think very seriously about. However, whether we are aware of it or not, the
issue is very widespread, and according to the FTC, it affects approximately 10
million Americans each year. This number is only expected to rise unless we do
all that we can to protect ourselves from these malicious activities.
By
Benson Yeung, Senior Partner

Benson Yeung Biography

Back to Top 
Information Request Form
|
 |